techlaw-weblog

How To Get Results When You Complain

Filed in archive Fraud , Product/Service Complain on May 25, 2010

How To Get Results When You Complain
© L_K_M
Here are some ideas that will get you results when you complain about the poor service or product you just ordered.

USE YOUR CAMERA. Always take pictures of anything unpleasant you find in the service given to you. Use your phone camera. Then when you talk to the manager or customer service representative, show them the pictures.

REQUEST A PRIVATE CHAT. A private talk with the manager gives an air of importance and mystery. And managers will usually be grateful that you didn't just start screaming for other customers to hear. Usually brings good results about 95% of the time.

BE PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE, PART 1. This is generally one kind of behavior we don't like but it might be appropriate in dealing with customer service representatives. If you're in a hotel or restaurant one thing you can do is to just start recounting the flaws of an experience and their unhappy effects on you and your company. Do not lie or exaggerate. Just state the facts, calmly. When the manager asks you, "Well, what can we do to make this right," just say "I don't know," and then restate the facts and their effects on you and your company.

Let it go round and round until the manager gets tired of hearing it and makes a settlement offer, which will very often exceed your most reasonable request.

TRY TO REVERSE THE CHARGE. Call your credit or charge card company and give compelling evidence that you've been had. The issuer of the card will first suspend the charge and investigate the matter, and then reverse it if your version of events wins the day.

BE PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE, PART 2. When you're on the phone with a customer representative, remember that time is on your side. Phone reps are often evaluated based on the number of calls per hour they can field. And more importantly nearly all reps are prohibited from hanging up on you. So the if you stay longer on the phone and repeat that you are not satisfied, and do not want to end the call, you improve the your chances of getting what you want.

CALL THE C.E.O. Find the name and phone number of headquarters then call that number and ask for 'Mr./Ms. X's office. "Don't say, 'I'd like to speak to Mr./Ms. X' - the operator will think you are a crank. You will usually get through the executive assistant of the chief executive and then you can start explaining the purpose of your call. Remember to ask for suggestions about what you can do. Saty on the line and you'll most likely be passed on to the VP of product management.

WRITE THE C.E.O. Send lots and lots of letters. Try to give reasonable but compelling evidence. Spice up your later by using the word FRAUD a few times. You'll be amazed how quickly you get results.

Bookmark
img Addthis
img Ask
img Blinklist
img del.icio.us
img Digg
img Fark
img Facebook
img Google
img Lycos
img Ma.gnolia
Add this page to Mister Wong Mr Wong
img Netscape
img Netvousz
img Newsvine
img Reddit
img StumbleUpon
img Slashdot
img Tailrank
img Technorati
img Wink
img Yahoo

Europe Pressures Google

Filed in archive Google on May 18, 2010

Europe Pressures Google
© Yodel Anecdotal
European pressure against Google is on! German prosecutors and the Czech data protection agency started investigating Google for reportedly intercepting private Wi-Fi data. Officials say that it could take two full weeks to determine whether a full-blown investigation of Google is in order.

Google is being intensely scrutinized authorities in Europe and the US after admitting it had intercepted communications sent over unsecured wireless networks in people's homes. This has caused a public outcry in both sides of the Atlantic and has dealt a blow to the internet company's credibility. Penalties of up to €392,000 ($482,000) may be imposed according to German news sources.

Google said it touched base with data protection agencies in the 30 countries where it has Street View and it has already deleted the data from Ireland, Denmark and Austria, although some states, such as Germany, want it kept for an investigation.

Unauthorized data collection is a crime in Germany punishable with a prison sentence of up to two years or a fine.

Bookmark
img Addthis
img Ask
img Blinklist
img del.icio.us
img Digg
img Fark
img Facebook
img Google
img Lycos
img Ma.gnolia
Add this page to Mister Wong Mr Wong
img Netscape
img Netvousz
img Newsvine
img Reddit
img StumbleUpon
img Slashdot
img Tailrank
img Technorati
img Wink
img Yahoo

Microsoft To Pay $200 Million For VPN Patent Case

Filed in archive Microsoft , Patent Infringement on May 18, 2010

Microsoft To Pay $200 Million For VPN Patent Case
© Robert Scoble
Microsoft will settle a patent infringement case by paying the VirnetX Holding Corporation $200 million in lump sum. The case was brought by VirnetX, claiming Microsoft was infringing on two of its patents on automatic and secure virtual private network (VPN) technology.

This may have significant implications for other high tech firms. VirnetX is an Internet security software company whose patent portfolio is highly utilized by the Central Intelligence Agency. Not a few large US high tech firms including Cisco, Google, HP, AT&T, and Verizon among others employ VPN technology.

In a statement issued by VirnetX, it said that the settlement emphasizes how important VirnetX's "Secure Domain Name Initiative" is. VirnetX officials believe that they will now be able to train their attention on an upcoming pilot system that will showcase VirnetX's automatic Virtual Private Network technology.

Both Microsoft and VirnetX announced on Monday "all other aspects of the settlement and license were not disclosed."

VirnetX was started by employees from Science Applications International Corp with the objective of marketing SAIC patents.

Bookmark
img Addthis
img Ask
img Blinklist
img del.icio.us
img Digg
img Fark
img Facebook
img Google
img Lycos
img Ma.gnolia
Add this page to Mister Wong Mr Wong
img Netscape
img Netvousz
img Newsvine
img Reddit
img StumbleUpon
img Slashdot
img Tailrank
img Technorati
img Wink
img Yahoo

Court Docs Reveal Fascinating Details On The Gizmodo-iPhone Battle

Filed in archive Blogs on May 16, 2010

Court Docs Reveal Fascinating Details On The Gizmodo-iPhone Battle
© William Hook
Are you following the strange tale of how tech blog Gizmodo came upon an unreleased iPhone prototype, wrote about it, and raised the ire of Apple and law enforcement officials? Then you know how Apple engineer Robert "Gray" Powell accidentally left his fourth-generation iPhone in a Redwood City, California restaurant. And how Brian Hogan gained possession of the phone and began shopping it around to several tech publishers. Gizmodo paid Hogan $5000 (and perhaps more) for the phone and then published a detailed preview of the device.

Well, here's what happened next:


  • On April 20, Apple claimed that Gizmodo's April 19 story exposing the next-gen iPhone was "immensely damaging" to the company. It said the article would hurt sales of current Apple products because potential customers would shun the current iPhone and wait for the new model. Apple attorney George Riley estimated the loss would be "huge," according to an affidavit by San Mateo County Sheriff's detective Matthew Broad.

  • Apple CEO Steve Jobs contacted Gizmodo editor Brian Lam and asked for the phone back. Lam responded via -email that he would, provided Apple sent him a letter stating the handset did in fact belong to the company.

  • Now, what's interesting here is Lam's e-mail to Jobs, which attempted to draw parallels between Gizmodo and Apple. Lam asked Apple's co-founder to recall what it was like to be a scrappy startup. Lam pitched for better communication between his blog and the privacy-obsessed Apple.

  • Apple got its phone back but the device was dead. There was a broken ribbon cable, a screw inserted into the wrong location caused an electrical short, broken back plate snaps, and stripped screws.

  • Gizmodo editor Jason Chen originally offered Hogan $10,000 for the iPhone prototype. No one knows for sure how much cash exactly exchanged hands.

  • A cash bonus from Gizmodo awaits Hogan in July if Apple announces a new iPhone at that time.



Read the full story here.

Bookmark
img Addthis
img Ask
img Blinklist
img del.icio.us
img Digg
img Fark
img Facebook
img Google
img Lycos
img Ma.gnolia
Add this page to Mister Wong Mr Wong
img Netscape
img Netvousz
img Newsvine
img Reddit
img StumbleUpon
img Slashdot
img Tailrank
img Technorati
img Wink
img Yahoo

LimeWire Liable For Music Copyright Infringement

Filed in archive Music Downloads on May 13, 2010

LimeWire Liable For Music Copyright Infringement
© gaudiramone
A federal judge ruled that the makers of LimeWire are liable when third-parties use the file-sharing software to illegally download copyrighted music.

U.S. District Judge Kimba Wood issued the ruling on May 12, in favor of 13 record companies. She said the defendants were fully aware their technology was being used to download copyrighted tunes and that LimeWire did not take "meaningful steps" to stop the infringement. Wood said Lime Wire sold its software to people it knew was "predisposed to committing infringement" and even helped those people.

Lime Wire Chief Executive George Searle said the company is "strongly opposed the court's recent decision," but did not say whether an appeal would be filed. "Lime Wire remains committed to developing innovative products and services for the end-user and to working with the entire music industry, including the major labels, to achieve this mission," Searle said.

The Recording Industry Association of America said the decision was "an important milestone" in the battle against online copyright infringement, because Gorton was found personally liable, as well as the company. They said this is "a clear signal to those who think they can devise and profit from a piracy scheme that will escape accountability."

LimeWire was started in 2000 and currently has about 50 million monthly users. Companies that sued LimeWire included Arista, Atlantic, BMG Music, Capital, Elektra, Interscope, LaFace, Motown, Priority, Sony BMG, UMG, Virgin and Warner Brothers.

Bookmark
img Addthis
img Ask
img Blinklist
img del.icio.us
img Digg
img Fark
img Facebook
img Google
img Lycos
img Ma.gnolia
Add this page to Mister Wong Mr Wong
img Netscape
img Netvousz
img Newsvine
img Reddit
img StumbleUpon
img Slashdot
img Tailrank
img Technorati
img Wink
img Yahoo
Share It
RSSrss
Google google
Yahoo! yahoo
Addthis Subscribe using any feed reader!
Bloglines Bloglines
TwitterFollow us on Twitter!
Most Popular   Apple   Blogs   Fraud   Google   iPhone   Microsoft   Mobile Phones   Music Downloads   Patent Infringement   Privacy Issues   Product/Service Complain